Friday, February 26, 2010

In DGB Quantum Psychoanalysis, There Are No Theoretical Boundaries...Except as Dictated by Subject Matter, Ethics, and Integrity

In DGB Quantum Psychoanalysis, there are not theoretical boundaries because theoretical boundaries set up an arbitrary self-contradiction from which we cannot escape as long as we cling to the boundary....

Every perspective, every theory, has its own particular strength...

And every perspective, every theory, has its own particular liability...

Why should we limit ourselves to the inevitable weakness of every one-sided theory?

Like a good husband and wife team working in harmony with each other,

Opposing theories can be used harmoniously and integratively to supplement each other's weakness...

To provide a more balanced, wholistic perspective...

When it comes to theories,

The only boundaries that should dictate,

Are those governed by subject-matter, ethics, and integrity...

And even here there is going to be ambiguity and plenty of room for debate,

For example, the subject matter is going to be influenced by 'outside factors',

That can change the nature of the discussion,

Or the boundaries of the subject matter,

Thus, we get 'bio-chemistry', and 'bio-physics',

And an essay like Freud's 'The Neuro-Psychoses of Defence' (1894).

Some boundaries are inherent to the subject-matter under investigation,

But many are simply 'made-made' conceptual and label boundaries,

That are meant to make thinking and understanding easier,

And oftentimes, these can come back to haunt us,

And cause us endless grief,

Until we finally figure out that we have created a man-made conceptual-semantic trap.

Boundaries are meant to be broken...(especially when we make them in the first place).

Giving proper respect to ethical and legal boundaries that are there for good reason.

This aside, we need to keep thinking 'inside and outside the box'.

Ascertaining how inside and outside factors influence each other,

Co-determine each other,

This is what Hegel called 'dialectic thinking'. 


I sometimes call it 'dialectic-democratic thinking'.

Or the 'dialectic-integrative evolution of theories'...

Which constantly looks for 'win-win solutions and conflict resolutions'...

To seemingly unsolvable and unresolvable paradoxes, dichotomies, impasses, and riddles...

When a theory becomes too self-limiting by the constriction of its own self-boundaries...

Think outside the boundary...

And then come back to integrate...

What is inside and outside the boundary...


You might be amazed at where it takes you, and what it gets you!

-- dgb, Feb. 26th, 2010; updated March 19th, 2010.

-- David Gordon Bain

-- Dialectic Gap-Bridging Negotiations...

-- Are Still In Process...